Table 4.

Hierarchial Regression Analyses of Residualized CAPS Scores by CSI Scores and Perpetrator Status

Outcome Step	β	R2/ΔR2	Model F (df)
CSI-Problem Solving			1.96 (3, 107)
1. Δ in problem solving	−.11	.02
2. perpetrator status	−.18	.03
3. Δ in problem solving by perpetrator status	−.02	.00
CSI-Cognitive Restructuring			3.80 (3, 109)*
1. Δ in cognitive restructuring	−.28*	.07
2. perpetrator status	−.15	.02
3. Δ in cognitive restructuring by perpetrator status	.04	.00
CSI-Emotional Expression			2.50 (3, 110)
1. Δ in emotional expression	−.22	.04
2. perpetrator status	−.16	.03
3. Δ in emotional expression by perpetrator status	.06	.00
CSI-Social Support			2.95 (3, 109)*
1. Δ in social support	−.21	.05
2. perpetrator status	−.16	.02
3. Δ in social support by perpetrator status	.00	.00
CSI-Problem Avoidance			1.50 (3, 109)
1. Δ in problem avoidance	.11	.00
2. perpetrator status	−.18	.03
3. Δ in problem avoidance by perpetrator status	−.11	.01
CSI-Wishful Thinking			3.14 (3, 109)*
1. Δ in wishful thinking	.28*	.04
2. perpetrator status	−.20*	.04
3. Δ in wishful thinking by perpetrator status	−.07	.00
CSI-Self-Criticism			2.46 (3, 110)
1. Δ in self-criticism	.25	.01
2. perpetrator status	−.22*	.05
3. Δ in self-criticism by perpetrator status	−.12	.01
CSI-Social Withdrawal			8.61 (3, 111)***
1. Δ in social withdrawal	.53***	.11
2. perpetrator status	−.18*	.03
3. Δ in social withdrawal by perpetrator status	−.30*	.05

Note. βs are for the final model.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.