Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 11;112(1-2):18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.05.005

Table 4.

Measures of association (95% confidence intervals) for an increase in education Gini value of one standard deviation from general estimating equation regression models of drinking behavior by individual educational attainment, New York Social Environment Study, New York, New York, 2005

(a) Odds ratios from logistic regression models of alcohol use in past 12 months

Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d
Educational attainment Ne OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Unstratified 3,889 1.38 (1.19, 1.59) 1.18 (1.08, 1.30) 1.21 (1.11, 1.32) 1.23 (1.12, 1.34)
Less than high school 539 0.72 (0.56, 0.92) 0.87 (0.66, 1.16) 0.87 (0.64, 1.18) 1.05 (0.77, 1.42)
High school/GED 965 1.09 (0.89, 1.33) 1.24 (0.97, 1.59) 1.26 (0.99, 1.62) 1.26 (0.98, 1.61)
Some college 900 1.12 (0.95, 1.33) 1.27 (0.99, 1.62) 1.29 (1.03, 1.62) 1.26 (1.06, 1.50)
College graduate 844 1.65 (1.40, 1.94) 1.32 (1.03, 1.69) 1.30 (1.01, 1.68) 1.30 (1.00, 1.68)
Graduate-level work 641 1.68 (1.39, 2.03) 1.31 (1.01, 1.70) 1.30 (1.00, 1.68) 1.33 (1.00, 1.76)

(b) Relative rates from Poisson regression models of the average number of drinks consumed per day among alcohol users

Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d
Educational attainment Ne RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI

Unstratified 1,502 0.92 (0.84, 1.00) 0.79 (0.68, 0.92) 0.79 (0.69, 0.90) 0.80 (0.70, 0.91)
Less than high school 119 0.75 (0.55, 1.02) 0.71 (0.47, 1.08) 0.67 (0.43, 1.04) 0.69 (0.42, 1.13)
High school/GED 298 1.05 (0.83, 1.33) 0.74 (0.59, 0.94) 0.75 (0.59, 0.94) 0.75 (0.59, 0.95)
Some college 310 0.89 (0.76, 1.04) 0.73 (0.57, 0.95) 0.73 (0.57, 0.94) 0.69 (0.50, 0.96)
College graduate 392 1.05 (0.83, 1.34) 0.80 (0.52, 1.24) 0.79 (0.55, 1.13) 0.78 (0.55, 1.12)
Graduate-level work 383 0.98 (0.85, 1.14) 0.99 (0.81, 1.20) 0.98 (0.79, 1.21) 0.93 (0.74, 1.18)
a

Adjusted for mean neighborhood educational attainment.

b

Model 1 + gender, race, age, income, marital status, student status, drinking before moving to neighborhood of residence, neighborhood median income, neighborhood income inequality

c

Model 2 + proportion of respondents in neighborhood who feel it is unacceptable for adults to drink alcohol

d

Model 3 + proportion of respondents in neighborhood who share the index respondent's education level and feel it is unacceptable for adults to drink alcohol

e

Weighted; for model 4 (most restricted model).