Table 4.
(a) Odds ratios from logistic regression models of alcohol use in past 12 months | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | Model 4d | ||||||
Educational attainment | Ne | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
Unstratified | 3,889 | 1.38 | (1.19, 1.59) | 1.18 | (1.08, 1.30) | 1.21 | (1.11, 1.32) | 1.23 | (1.12, 1.34) |
Less than high school | 539 | 0.72 | (0.56, 0.92) | 0.87 | (0.66, 1.16) | 0.87 | (0.64, 1.18) | 1.05 | (0.77, 1.42) |
High school/GED | 965 | 1.09 | (0.89, 1.33) | 1.24 | (0.97, 1.59) | 1.26 | (0.99, 1.62) | 1.26 | (0.98, 1.61) |
Some college | 900 | 1.12 | (0.95, 1.33) | 1.27 | (0.99, 1.62) | 1.29 | (1.03, 1.62) | 1.26 | (1.06, 1.50) |
College graduate | 844 | 1.65 | (1.40, 1.94) | 1.32 | (1.03, 1.69) | 1.30 | (1.01, 1.68) | 1.30 | (1.00, 1.68) |
Graduate-level work | 641 | 1.68 | (1.39, 2.03) | 1.31 | (1.01, 1.70) | 1.30 | (1.00, 1.68) | 1.33 | (1.00, 1.76) |
(b) Relative rates from Poisson regression models of the average number of drinks consumed per day among alcohol users | |||||||||
Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | Model 4d | ||||||
Educational attainment | Ne | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI |
Unstratified | 1,502 | 0.92 | (0.84, 1.00) | 0.79 | (0.68, 0.92) | 0.79 | (0.69, 0.90) | 0.80 | (0.70, 0.91) |
Less than high school | 119 | 0.75 | (0.55, 1.02) | 0.71 | (0.47, 1.08) | 0.67 | (0.43, 1.04) | 0.69 | (0.42, 1.13) |
High school/GED | 298 | 1.05 | (0.83, 1.33) | 0.74 | (0.59, 0.94) | 0.75 | (0.59, 0.94) | 0.75 | (0.59, 0.95) |
Some college | 310 | 0.89 | (0.76, 1.04) | 0.73 | (0.57, 0.95) | 0.73 | (0.57, 0.94) | 0.69 | (0.50, 0.96) |
College graduate | 392 | 1.05 | (0.83, 1.34) | 0.80 | (0.52, 1.24) | 0.79 | (0.55, 1.13) | 0.78 | (0.55, 1.12) |
Graduate-level work | 383 | 0.98 | (0.85, 1.14) | 0.99 | (0.81, 1.20) | 0.98 | (0.79, 1.21) | 0.93 | (0.74, 1.18) |
Adjusted for mean neighborhood educational attainment.
Model 1 + gender, race, age, income, marital status, student status, drinking before moving to neighborhood of residence, neighborhood median income, neighborhood income inequality
Model 2 + proportion of respondents in neighborhood who feel it is unacceptable for adults to drink alcohol
Model 3 + proportion of respondents in neighborhood who share the index respondent's education level and feel it is unacceptable for adults to drink alcohol
Weighted; for model 4 (most restricted model).