Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 May 13;28(7):1235–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.05.002

Table 2.

Design information and outcomes

Authors Sample
size
Research design and assignment Predominant psychiatric
diagnoses/comparison
Baseline status Self-help
outcomes
Beals et al. (2006) 2,825 Retrospective self-report 22.6% Depression or
Anxiety disorders
Bogenschutz (2005) 10 Prospective uncontrolled 80% Schizophrenia +SU
Bogenschutz and Akin (2000) 81 Retrospective self-report 50.6% Schizophrenia or
Schizoaffective disorders
−/=Involve
(diagnosis)
Brooks and Penn (2003) 112 Prospective randomized 50.5% Mood disorders 50% previously
incarcerated
+SU
−Psych
Brown et al. (2006) 66 Prospective randomized 100% Major Depressive
Disorder
=Psych
=SU
Brush and McGee (2000) 100 Retrospective self-report Not reported 100% homeless
Chen (2006) 93 Prospective quasi-experimental Only symptoms reported 100% offenders +Psych
Chi et al. (2006) 104 Prospective quasi-experimental 72% Major Depression;
Dual vs. SU only
+SU
DiNitto et al. (2002) 97 Prospective uncontrolled 74% Mood Disorders;
Male vs. Female
56% on probation
or parole
=Involve
DiNitto et al. (2001) 97 Prospective uncontrolled 74% Mood Disorders 55% on probation
or parole
=Involve
=SU
Easton et al. (2007) 78 Prospective randomized 14% Antisocial Personality
Disorder
100% domestic
violence offenders
=SU
=Psych
Fichter et al. (1997) 146 Retrospective self-report 44.4% Affective disorders 100% homeless
Friedman et al. (2005) 132 Retrospective self-report 100% Bipolar Disorder 68% legal offenses
Gonzalez and Rosenheck (2002) 5060 Prospective quasi-experimental Dual vs. SU only Mean 37.8 days in past 60
Mean 1.6 days in jail
or prison
+SU
Grella (2003) 400 Prospective quasi-experimental 63.7% Mood Disorders 82% homeless at some
point in lifetime
=Involve
(disorder)
Herman et al. (2000) 429 Prospective randomized 28.1% Schizophrenia +SU
Herman et al. (1991) 100 Retrospective self-report 36% Personality disorders;
Homeless vs. Not
46% homeless +Involve
(homeless)
Hoff et al. (1999) 352 Retrospective record review 82% Dually-diagnosed 100% individuals qualified
for jail diversion
Jerrell (1996) 132 Prospective quasi-experimental 100% Dually diagnosed −SU
−Psych
Jerrell and Ridgely (1995) 31 Prospective quasi-experimental 39% Schizophrenia or
Schizoaffective disorder
−Psych
Jerrell and Ridgely (1999a) 132 Prospective quasi-experimental 100% Dually-diagnosed −Psych
Jerrell and Ridgely (1999b) 132 Prospective quasi-experimental 76% Schizophrenia
Jerrell and Wilson (1997) 132 Prospective quasi-experimental 75.8% Schizophrenia −Psych
Jordan et al. (2002) 351 Prospective quasi-experimental 50% Schizophrenia or
Schizoaffective
−Involve
(disorder)
Kelly et al. (2003) 2161 Prospective quasi-experimental MDD with SU vs. SU only −Involve (MDD)
+/=SU
=Psych
Kilbourne et al. (2002) 974 Retrospective self-report 48.4% Depressive
symptoms in previous
12 months
100% homeless −/=Psych
Kingree (1995) 196 Retrospective self-report Collected but not reported −/=Psych
Laudet, Cleland, Magura, Vogel, and Knight (2004) 99 Prospective uncontrolled 43% Schizophrenia 9% homeless +SU
Laudet, Magura, Cleland, Vogel, and Knight (2003) 276 Prospective uncontrolled 35% Schizophrenia
Laudet et al. (2004) 233 Prospective uncontrolled 39% Schizophrenia +SU
Laudet et al. (2000a) 310 Retrospective self-report 43% Schizophrenia 6% homeless 7% on
probation or parole
Laudet, Magura, Vogel, and Knight (2000b) 310 Retrospective self-report 43% Schizophrenia 6% homeless
7% on probation or parole
+SU
+Psych
Laudet, Magura, Vogel, and Knight (2003) 277 Prospective uncontrolled 31% Schizophrenia 15% shelter or
single-room occupancy
Laudet, Magura, Vogel, and Knight (2004) 310 Retrospective self-report 35% Schizophrenia 6% homeless 7% on
probation or parole
Magura et al. (2007) 310 Prospective uncontrolled 39% Schizophrenia 5% homeless +Psych
Magura, Knight et al. (2003) 276 Prospective uncontrolled 35% Schizophrenia 2% homeless 63%
arrested as adults
+SU
Magura et al. (2002) 240 Prospective uncontrolled 48% Schizophrenia 11% homeless +Psych
Magura, Laudet et al. (2003) 277 Prospective uncontrolled 31% Schizophrenia 5% homeless 66%
arrested as adults
+SU
Miller et al. (1999) 2,029 Prospective uncontrolled 28% Lifetime major
depression
+SU
Moggi et al. (1999) 981 Prospective quasi-experimental 85.5% Non-psychotic
disorders
+Psych
Moos, Finney, Ouimette, and Suchinsky (1999) 3018 Prospective quasi-experimental 35% Dually diagnosed 34% arrested in
past 12 months
+SU
+Psych
Myrick and Brady (1997) 44 Retrospective quasi-experimental Social Phobia vs. SU only −Involve
(Social Phobia)
Ouimette et al. (2001) 1588 Prospective quasi-experimental PTSD/SU vs. SU only +Psych
=Involve
Ouimette et al. (1999) 3018 Prospective quasi-experimental Dual vs. SU only +SU
+Psych
=Involve
Ouimette et al. (2000) 125 Prospective uncontrolled 100% PTSD and SU +SU
Ouimette et al. (2003) 100 Prospective uncontrolled 100% PTSD and SU +SU
Penn and Brooks (2000) 112 Prospective quasi-experimental 100% Dually diagnosed 50% previously
incarcerated
+SU
−Psych
Pristach and Smith (1999) 60 Retrospective self-report 33% Affective disorders =Involve
(diagnosis)
Ridgely and Jerrell (1996) 35 Prospective Staff interviews;
none reported
Ritsher et al. (2002) 2595 Prospective quasi-experimental Dual vs. SU only +SU
=Involve
Severance (2004) 40 Retrospective self-report Not reported 100% incarcerated
Timko and Sempel (2004) 230 Prospective uncontrolled 19% Major Depression 13.9% no stable living
arrangement
+SU
+Psych
Trumbetta et al. (1999) 130 Prospective uncontrolled 35.4% Major depression 100% homeless +SU
Vogel et al. (1998) 52 Retrospective self-report 46% Unipolar Depression
Westermeyer and Chitasombat (1996) 137 Retrospective self-report Symptoms only;
Compare ethnicity
−Involve
(Hmong)
Westermeyer et al. (1998) 347 Retrospective chart review
and self-report
Dysthymia vs. SU only =Involve
Westermeyer et al. (1997) 411 Retrospective chart review
and self-report
MDD vs. SU only =Involve
Westermeyer and Schneekloth (1999) 325 Retrospective chart review
and self-report
Schizophrenia/SU vs. SU only =Involve
Wright et al. (2002) 40 Retrospective self-report Dual vs. PD only 48% previous offenses

Note. + indicates positive or beneficial findings.

− indicates negative or negative comparative findings.

= indicates equivalent or ambiguous findings.

Involve denotes group comparisons on self-help involvement or participation.

SU denotes substance use findings.

Psych denotes psychological variable findings.