Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Gerontol. 2007 May 24;42(10):979–987. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2007.05.005

TABLE 2.

Coefficients from regression models of health outcomes in 2003 on DHEAS in 2000a, unweighted analyses

Mobility Limitations CES-D Cognitive Impairment Poor Self-Assessed Health
(1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2)
DHEAS (μg/dl): Femalesb 0.0009 0.0010 0.0044 0.0041 −0.0016 −0.0017 0.0006 0.0006
DHEAS squared: Femalesb -- -- -- -- 0.000008 0.000008 -- --
DHEAS (μg/dl): Maleb −0.0030**c 0.0032**c −0.0082* −0.0088* −0.0016*** −0.0016*** −0.0019 −0.0022*
DHEAS squared: Maleb -- -- -- -- 0.000005*** 0.00005*** -- --
Cortisol (μg/g creatinine) −0.0014 −0.0012 0.0016 −0.0008 −0.0002 −0.0002 0.0016 0.0011
Cortisol squared 0.00001* 0.00001* -- -- -- -- -- --
*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001

a

Models are fitted using linear regression for the depressive symptom score, Poisson regression for cognitive impairment, zero-inflated Poisson regression for mobility limitations, and ordered logistic regression for self-assessed health status. Both models includes the control variables, while Model 2 also adjusts for cardiovascular risk factors (see Table 1).

b

For variables with sex interactions, we show the total effect for males (equivalent to the main effect) and females (equivalent to the sum of the main and the interaction effect).

c

Sex difference in the parameter estimate is significant (p<0.05).