Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):480–489. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513286

Table 2.

Percent rate of CP and mean number of profile comparisons exceeding thresholds for r

Copying at r > .70 Copying at r > .80 Copying at r > .90
Normal Patient Random Normal Patient Random Normal Patient Random
Percent of sample with CP present
Introjection 94a 73a 35a 89a 60a 16a 74a 33a 3a
Identification 98a 88a 58a 98a 78a 23a 92a 55a 3a
Recapitulation 99a 90a 55a 97a 85a 23a 92a 67a 3a
Any Copy Process 100b 98b 91a 99a 94a 52a 98a 81a 8a

Mean number of profiles suggesting CP when present (standard deviation in parentheses)
Introjection 6.3a
(3.6)
3.7a
(2.9)
1.3a
(0.6)
4.8a
(3.2)
2.9a
(2.5)
1.1a
(0.2)
2.9a
(2.5)
2.1a
(1.7)
1.0a
(0.0)
Identification 19.7a
(9.5)
10.1a
(8.4)
1.6a
(0.8)
16.6a
(9.4)
7.9a
(7.5)
1.1a
(0.3)
11.8a
(8.4)
5.3a
(5.9)
1.0a
(0.0)
Recapitulation 15.1a
(6.7)
8.8a
(6.2)
1.3a
(0.5)
12.6a
(6.7)
6.7a
(5.8)
1.1a
(0.2)
8.4a
(5.9)
4.2a
(4.2)
1.0a
(0.0)
Any Copy Process 40.1a
(18.9)
19.8a
(16.0)
2.3a
(1.3)
32.9a
(18.3)
14.5a
(14.0)
1.3a
(0.6)
21.3a
(15.5)
7.9a
(9.6)
1.1a
(0.3)

a

Indicates value is significantly different from both contrasting groups (p < .05).

b

Value is significantly different only from the randomly generated group.

“Normal” non-clinical N = 133; Patient N = 165; Random data N = 200.

Maximum number of profiles possible for each CP: Introjection = 16, Identification = 32, Recapitulation = 24 (Total = 72).