Table 2.
Recurrence Definition | Number of siblings affected by definition |
Proportion(%) of families with additional affected sib | Proportion (%) of all siblings in the families affected | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | |||
Single Criterion | ||||
Categorical ASD DX | 100 | 38* | 10.9** | 8.2 |
SCQ > =15 | 108 | 53 | 12.4 | 9.6 |
SRS-T >= 75 | 99 | 64* | 12.5 | 9.7 |
History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech | 80 | 70 | 10.8 | 8.9 |
Category “Change” when switching from categorical to quantitative threshold | ||||
No ASD DX but SCQ>=15 | 27 | 22 | -- | -- |
No ASD DX but SRS-T>=75 | 28 | 33 | -- | -- |
Combined Criteria | ||||
ASD or SCQ>=15 | 127 | 60 | 14.4 | 11.1 |
ASD or SRS-T>=75 | 128 | 71 | 15.1 | 11.8 |
ASD or History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech | 180 | 108 | 21.7** | 17.1 |
ASD or History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech or SCQ>=15 or SRS-T>=75 | 211 | 142 | 26.0 | 20.9 |
When exclusively considering later-born siblings (of relevance for comparison to high-risk infant sibling studies), the proportion of individual siblings affected by ASD was 14.2%. When including history of language delay with autistic speech and ASD in the definition of affected status, that proportion was 23.2%.
For difference in proportion of all female sibs affected as a function of recurrence classification, comparing standardized T-score threshold to community diagnosis, McNemar’s Test, Two-Tail p=.000042
Difference in recurrence rate with versus without inclusion of siblings with History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech, p<.001.