Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct 1;167(11):1349–1356. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101470

Table 2.

Recurrence Rate as a function of “recurrence” definition.

Recurrence Definition Number of siblings affected by definition
Proportion(%) of families with additional affected sib Proportion (%) of all siblings in the families affected
Male Female

Single Criterion
Categorical ASD DX 100 38* 10.9** 8.2
SCQ > =15 108 53 12.4 9.6
SRS-T >= 75 99 64* 12.5 9.7
History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech 80 70 10.8 8.9

Category “Change” when switching from categorical to quantitative threshold
No ASD DX but SCQ>=15 27 22 -- --
No ASD DX but SRS-T>=75 28 33 -- --

Combined Criteria
ASD or SCQ>=15 127 60 14.4 11.1
ASD or SRS-T>=75 128 71 15.1 11.8
ASD or History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech 180 108 21.7** 17.1
ASD or History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech or SCQ>=15 or SRS-T>=75 211 142 26.0 20.9

When exclusively considering later-born siblings (of relevance for comparison to high-risk infant sibling studies), the proportion of individual siblings affected by ASD was 14.2%. When including history of language delay with autistic speech and ASD in the definition of affected status, that proportion was 23.2%.

*

For difference in proportion of all female sibs affected as a function of recurrence classification, comparing standardized T-score threshold to community diagnosis, McNemar’s Test, Two-Tail p=.000042

**

Difference in recurrence rate with versus without inclusion of siblings with History of Language Delay with Autistic Speech, p<.001.