Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul 27;80(3):358–363. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.034

Table 6.

Patient, Physician and Relational Communication Factors Associated with Patient Reports of a Shared Decision-making Process for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Multivariable Logistic Regression Results (N=326).

Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value

Patient and Physician Socio-demographic Characteristics

Patient Age 0.10 (0.9-1.0) 0.84

Patient Female Gender 1.14 (0.9-2.0) 0.67

Patient Race
 African American 1.0

 White 1.22 (0.7 – 1.9) 0.40

 Other 1.14 (0.6 – 2.0) 0.85

Patient Education
 Less than High School Diploma 1.16 (0.3-4.8) 0.84

 High School Diploma 1.0

 Some College or More 1.10 (0.7-1.8) 0.69

Patient Income
 <$20,000 1.23 (0.5-3.1) 0.67

 $20,000 - $60,000 1.0

 >$60,000 0.79 (0.5-1.4) 0.41

Patient Unemployed Status 1.36 (0.7-2.5) 0.32

Physician Male Gender 0.57 (0.4-0.9) <0.02

Physician Race
 African American 1.0

 White 0.89 (0.5-1.5) 0.65

 Other 0.74 (0.4-1.3) 0.29

Physician Age in Years 0.99 (0.9, 1.0) 0.32

General Internal Medicine 0.99 (0.7-1.4) 0.96

Family Medicine 1.0

Physician-Patient Race Concordance 0.86 (0.6-1.2) 0.40

Physician-Patient Gender Concordance 0.88 (0.5-1.6) 0.66

Observer-rated Elements of SDM

Element 1: MD and patient involved in DM process 0.76 (0.5-1.2) 0.27

Element 2: MD and patient share information 1.01 (0.6-1.6) 0.98

Element 3: MD and patient express treatment preferences 0.60 (0.2-1.8) 0.37

Element 4: MD and patient agree on treatment 0.77 (0.3-2.0) 0.60

Relational Communication

Relational Communication Latent Factor Score 1.33 (1.0-1.7) 0.03