Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 18;65(Pt 12):m1606–m1607. doi: 10.1107/S160053680904817X

Table 2. Comparative geometrical parameters (Å, °) for similar [Rh(N,O-bid)(CO)(PPh3)] complexes.

Parameters (I)a (II)b (III)c (IV)d
Rh1—N11 2.077 (2) 2.069 (2) 2.045 (4) 2.045 (3)
Rh1—O12 2.027 (2) 2.028 (2) 2.044 (3) 2.045 (2)
Rh1—P13 2.2704 (7) 2.2635 (6) 2.275 (1) 2.281 (2)
Rh1—C14 1.812 (3) 1.807 (2) 1.784 (5) 1.804 (3)
C14—O14 1.147 (3) 1.152 (3) 1.142 (7) 1.148 (4)
N11⋯O12 2.885 (3) 2.885 (3) 2.826 (6) 2.841 (3)
N11—Rh1—O12 89.31 (9) 89.54 (8) 87.4 (1) 87.95 (8)
O12—Rh1—P13 85.95 (6) 84.97 (5) 89.7 (1) 89.91 (5)
P13—Rh1—C14 91.57 (9) 91.87 (7) 90.3 (2) 89.48 (9)
N11—Rh1—C14 93.1 (1) 93.6 (1) 92.6 (2) 92.6 (1)
N11—C2—C4—O12 −2.6 (2) 4.1 (2) 1.2 (4) 1.5 (2)
θE e 155.77 (2) 156.39 (3) 156.0 (2) 156.23 (4)

Notes: (a) This work; (b) N,O-bid = 4-(2,3-dimethyl phenylamino)pent-3-en-2-onato (Venter et al., 2009); (c) N,O-bid = 4-amino-pent-3-en-2-onato (Damoense et al., 1994); (d) N,O-bid = 4-amino-1,1,1-trifluoro-pent-3-en-2-onato (Varshavsky et al., 2001); (e) cone angle (Tolman, 1977).