Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Aug 2;79(2):616–622. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.051

Table 4.

Difference between gEUD for FSall and FSclin as a function of α/β-ratio and gEUD volume parameter ‘a’, both in absolute dose and as a percentage. The underlined values for each normal tissue corresponds with the α/β ratio as used in this work.

α/β a FSall FSclin Diff. (Gy) Diff. (%)
Chordoma group Frontal lobe (left) 1.0 5.0 16.1 18.5 2.4 13
2.0 5.0 17.0 18.9 1.9 10
3.5 5.0 17.7 19.2 1.5 8
2.0 2.0 9.1 10.1 1.0 10
2.0 5.0 17.0 18.9 1.9 10
2.0 10.0 24.2 26.9 2.7 10

Prostate group Femoral head (left) 1.0 4.0 18.9 27.7 8.8 32
2.0 4.0 21.9 28.5 6.6 23
3.5 4.0 24.3 29.1 4.8 16
1.0 2.0 18.0 26.2 8.2 31
1.0 4.0 18.9 27.7 8.8 32
1.0 6.0 19.4 28.3 8.9 31