Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009 Dec 30;34(4):298–307. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.12.001

Table 2.

Mean ± standard deviation values of the Dice measure and the median absolute distance between the estimated surface and the ground truth surface using the proposed approach, compared for different number of training shapes in the hearing aid shell dataset.

Number of training samples Dice overlap (%) Median absolute distance (mm)
Tests with N = 33 shapes 84.53 ± 6.29 0.53 ± 0.37
Tests with N = 23 shapes 84.26 ± 7.32 0.58 ± 0.43
Tests with N = 13 shapes 83.10 ± 7.43 0.67 ± 0.44