Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 9;11(3):1038–1044. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9459-z

Table II.

Physicomechanical Evaluation of Atenolol Buccal Patches

Formulations Weight variationa (g) Thicknessa (mm) Folding endurance Drug contenta (%)
F 1 2.06 ± 0.06 0.54 ± 0.02 81 99.50 ± 0.10
F 2 2.09 ± 0.03 0.56 ± 0.04 83 98.61 ± 0.09
F 3 2.10 ± 0.06 0.57 ± 0.04 88 99.14 ± 0.08
F 4 2.03 ± 0.05 0.53 ± 0.05 80 99.42 ± 0.12
F 5 2.02 ± 0.04 0.53 ± 0.03 86 98.87 ± 0.11
F 6 2.00 ± 0.05 0.54 ± 0.01 91 98.43 ± 0.10
F 7 2.09 ± 0.07 0.58 ± 0.02 83 98.24 ± 0.10
F 8 2.07 ± 0.08 0.56 ± 0.02 84 98.43 ± 0.12
F 9 2.10 ± 0.09 0.55 ± 0.05 82 98.61 ± 0.12
F 10 2.10 ± 0.09 0.56 ± 0.03 80 99.77 ± 0.12
F 11 2.11 ± 0.07 0.54 ± 0.04 93 99.60 ± 0.13
F 12 2.09 ± 0.09 0.53 ± 0.04 90 98.88 ± 0.10
F 13 2.06 ± 0.06 0.51 ± 0.04 92 99.51 ± 0.10
F 14 2.12 ± 0.08 0.59 ± 0.05 86 99.77 ± 0.12

aAll values are mean ± SD, n = 3.