Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 9;11(3):1038–1044. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9459-z

Table III.

Moisture Content (%) and Moisture Uptake (%) of Different Atenolol Buccal Patches

Formulations Moisture content (%)a Moisture uptake (%)a
(76% RH) (86% RH)
F 1 1.32 ± 0.01 4.07 ± 0.06 6.20 ± 0.06
F 2 1.43 ± 0.01 4.17 ± 0.10 6.22 ± 0.08
F 3 1.67 ± 0.02 4.23 ± 0.09 6.33 ± 0.09
F 4 1.47 ± 0.02 3.89 ± 0.08 5.84 ± 0.04
F 5 1.03 ± 0.01 3.53 ± 0.07 4.84 ± 0.03
F 6 1.04 ± 0.02 3.36 ± 0.06 4.53 ± 0.05
F 7 0.96 ± 0.01 3.75 ± 0.11 4.86 ± 0.07
F 8 0.98 ± 0.01 3.57 ± 0.07 4.97 ± 0.10
F 9 1.04 ± 0.01 3.90 ± 0.05 5.16 ± 0.07
F 10 1.22 ± 0.01 4.42 ± 0.12 5.27 ± 0.09
F 11 1.46 ± 0.02 4.46 ± 0.13 5.35 ± 0.17
F 12 1.53 ± 0.03 4.57 ± 0.09 5.12 ± 0.07
F 13 1.16 ± 0.01 4.66 ± 0.17 5.10 ± 0.20
F 14 1.23 ± 0.01 4.87 ± 0.20 6.78 ± 0.20

aAll values are mean ± SD, n = 3.