Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 26;11(3):1068–1083. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9469-x

Table I.

Mean Flux of DEET in Presence of Laurocapram and Iminosulfurane Analogues in Selected Vehicles (3)

Treatments Mean flux, J (μg/cm2 h) MRaJ
No treatment 58.0 ± 19.4 1.0
Water 168.2 ± 22.9b 2.9
PG 256.0 ± 61.7b 4.4
Ethanol 112.6 ± 23.2b 1.9
PEG 400 25.6 ± 12.2b 0.4
Laurocapram 122.3 ± 26.8b 2.1
Laurocapram–water 268.3 ± 37.4b 4.6
Laurocapram–PG 291.2 ± 18.1b 5.1
Laurocapram–ethanol 111.5 ± 7.9b 1.9
laurocapram–PEG 400 18.4 ± 4.9b 0.3
N-0915–water 154.4 ± 28.6b 2.7
N-0915–PG 48.8 ± 15.8 0.8
N-0915–ethanol 16.3 ± 4.1b 0.3
N-0915–PEG 400 14.7 ± 4.7b 0.2
DMBIS–water 178.0 ± 7.1b 1.8
DMBIS–PG 335.0 ± 22.0b 3.4
DMBIS–ethanol 150.1 ± 14.9b 1.5
DMBIS–PEG 400 192.8 ± 8.2b 1.9
DMMCBI–water 143.1 ± 44.7b 2.5
DMMCBI–PG 67.7 ± 25.9 1.2
DMMCBI–ethanol 37.3 ± 0.2 0.6
DMMCBI–PEG 400 36.0 ± 2.5 0.6
TBDOC–water 216.9 ± 5.1b 2.2
TBDOC–PG 487.6 ± 41.6b 5.0
TBDOC–ethanol 44.5 ± 8.4b 0.4
TBDOC–PEG 400 192.0 ± 7.2b 2.0

aRatio of J of DEET in presence of treatment to J of DEET in absence of treatment

bStatistically different compared to no treatment at 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05)