Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 5;5(11):e13845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013845

Table 2. Intertidal and subtidal echinoderm assemblages from 16x quadrat collections: Spearman Rank Correlation (rho) of abundance (N), residuals of abundance regressed against number of sampling quadrats (Nresid), expected number of taxa ES5, and Taxonomic Distinctness index (Δ*) versus latitude (Lat).

intertidal (n = 26) subtidal (n = 31)
rho p-value rho p-value
N vs Lat 0.463 0.017 −0.236 0.166
Nresid vs Lat 0.322 0.051 −0.317 0.059
ES5 vs Lat 0.422 0.032 −0.059 0.734
Δ* vs Lat 0.377 0.063 −0.306 0.094

Bold print indicates significant correlations at α≤0.05.