Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Dec 1;55(4):466–472. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ec2a68

Table 3.

Antibiotic Resistance Data for 191~ S. aureus Isolates

% Resistant*
PEN FOX OX^ LVX GEN ERY CLIN# TET RIF SXT VAN
99 20 27 45 9 95 83 16 1.6 89 0

Key: PEN, penicillin; FOX, cefoxitin; Ox, oxacillin; LVX, levofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; ERY, erythromycin; CLIN, clindamycin; TET, tetracycline; RIF, rifampin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; VAN, vancomycin

~

One isolate was missing and could not be tested

*

Isolates classified as intermediate by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion were categorized as resistant

^

Data differs from Cefoxitin data, in part, because not all samples were tested with a FOX disk

#

80 isolates expressed inducible resistance (positive D-test). These were categorized as resistant.