Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 4;2011:451489. doi: 10.4061/2011/451489

Table 1.

Comparisons between patients chewing and not chewing betel nut and having and not having subclinical ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Betel nut chewing Subclinical IHD
No Yes No Yes
n 349 45 323 71
Age, years 63.9 (9.3) 56.3 (8.6)** 62.0 (9.4) 67.6 (9.1)**
Diabetic duration, years 10.4 (7.6) 10.3 (8.8) 10.4 (7.6) 10.7 (8.5)
Body mass index, kg/m2 24.5 (3.0) 25.9 (3.7)** 24.6 (3.2) 24.8 (2.9)
Smoking, % 60.5 86.7** 63.2 64.8
Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL 159.4 (57.3) 178.6 (74.8)* 162.2 (56.5) 159.1 (72.9)
Hypertension, % 52.4 60.0 52.3 57.8
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 132.8 (15.8) 131.9 (16.1) 132.1 (15.4) 135.2 (17.5)
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 83.2 (8.8) 84.8 (7.0) 83.4 (8.4) 83.1 (9.6)
Dyslipidemia, % 56.0 68.9 56.5 62.0
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 199.8 (45.9) 196.9 (38.2) 199.1 (45.1) 201.3 (44.9)
Triglyceride, mg/dL 168.7 (193.3) 180.0 (83.1) 168.9 (196.2) 174.9 (114.6)
Ischemic heart disease, % 16.6 28.9*
Betel nut chewing, % 9.9 18.0*

*P < .05; **P < .01.