Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Nov;32(5):1197–1208. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22344

Table 3.

The coefficient of joint variation (cjv) between gray matter an white matter are presented for eight sets of BrainWeb simulated human brain images. Correct histogram waveforms should have cjv close to that of the standard. A smaller value of cjv implies better tissue contrast. Six sets of volumes had 3% noise level, while two sets of proton density-weighted data had 9% noise level.

Scan Type Data Set cjv(GM,WM) (%)
Standard Biased SPM BSU N3 New
PDW (3%noise) Normal 56.4 164.9 59.4 68.5 60.7 83.2
MS 60.8 201.6 63.6 72.6 65.4 85.8

PDW (9%noise) Normal 157.1 250.2 153.9* 212.0 154.2* 179.5
MS 167.3 293.4 162.6* 209.3 162.1* 203.2

T1 (3%noise) Normal 44.6 67.2 47.4 50.0 47.0 53.7
MS 44.6 66.0 47.3 50.2 46.9 53.5

T2 (3%noise) Normal 68.1 100.5 75.2 262.0 95.7 72.7
MS 70.2 132.7 77.1 221.8 76.8 81.4

BSU = BrainSuite, MS = multiple sclerosis, N3 = nonparametric nonuniform intensity normalization, New = the algorithm presented in this study, SPM = statistical parametric mapping,

*

cjv values of processed data smaller than those of the standard unbiased data (over correction),

cjv values of processed data larger than those of the original biased data (failed correction)