Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Mamm Genome. 2009 Aug 6;20(9-10):681–698. doi: 10.1007/s00335-009-9209-2

Table 4.

QTL affecting growth (gain in body mass) from 1 to 2 weeks of age

Chr QTL Marker Map position
(cM)
Physical position
(Mb)
LPR Effect(s)
1 EG1.1 rs3692731 44.27 105.9 4.40 d = 0.20
3 EG3.1 rs3684333 54.17 107.3 2.43 a = −0.12
i = −0.10
5 EG5.1 mCV25284008 0.90 12.5 2.26 d = −0.14
8 EG8.1 rs6410533 4.22 14.3 8.82 a = 0.20
d = 0.20
10 EG10.1 rs13480652 30.94 74.1 2.58 d = −0.16
13 EG13.1 rs6215262 0.00 3.7 2.43 i = 0.12
13 EG13.2 rs6271232 15.71 41.9 2.41 a = −0.12
13 EG13.3 rs3718727 28.46 66.2 2.88 d = 0.16
14 EG14.1 rs3718262 39.17 92.4 3.70 a = 0.16
15 EG15.1 rs4230908 38.13 83.2 3.71 a = 0.12
d = 0.14
19 EG19.1 rs3711945 53.97 58.6 2.44 i = −0.12

Shown for each locus are the chromosome, QTL name, marker name, map position (in F2 centimorgan [cM] units), physical position (in megabases [Mb], according to mouse genome build 37 from www.ensembl.org), LPR for the significance test, and the effects of the locus in standard deviation units. Only significant effects are shown (i.e., effects where the LPR for the given effect is > 1.3, which corresponds to p = 0.05)