Table 1. The interaction of type 2 RBP-J mutants with the ANK repeats of IC.
DNA | GST pull-down assays | Transcriptional activity | |||||||
|
|
binding |
ANK |
RAM |
CID |
KyoT2 |
RAMIC |
IC |
ANK–VP16 |
wild-type RBP-J | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
5a | KR185GS | 104 | 109 | 114 | 92 | 108 | 71 | 56 | 83 |
6 | S194A | 92 | 92 | 103 | 90 | 102 | 41 | 39 | 47 |
7a | KK196GS | 102 | 135 | 101 | 90 | 99 | 49 | 53 | 67 |
5a+6 | KR185GS+S194A | 92 | 146 | 110 | 95 | 107 | 18 | 27 | 35 |
5a+7a | KR185GS+KK196GS | 106 | 116 | 108 | 81 | 98 | 19 | 38 | 73 |
6+7a | S194A+KK196GS | 104 | 95 | 107 | 80 | 97 | 23 | 34 | 55 |
26 | InsRsa1265 | 96 | 131 | 95 | 70 | 88 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Relative transcriptional activities induced by Notch IC and ANK–VP16 (and RAMIC) of RBP-J mutants compared to wild-type RBP-J were evaluated by the same approach as described in Figure 1A (1 µg of pEFBOSneo IC or 0.25 µg of pEFBOSneo ANK–VP16 was reacted as an activator). Relative affinities of RBP-J mutants for GST fusion proteins were also evaluated in the GST pull-down assays as described in Figure 2D. To detect relative DNA-binding properties, the same amounts of in vitro-translated type 2 RBP-J mutants were reacted with the 32P-labeled O54 probes and evaluated by EMSA in a linear range (16). All activities are relative to wild-type RBP-J.