Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2010 Sep 17;1362:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.038

Table 2.

Mean relative CRH, CRH-R1, BDNF, NGF, NT3, trkB, and trkA mRNA expression levels

Probe/Brain Region Controls Increased
Complexity
Exercise
CRH
PVN 200 (15) 277 (13) 244 (19)
CRH R1
MeA 33 (6) 39 (7) 43(9)
BDNF
BLA* 18 (3) 19 (3) 35 (7)ab
Dentate Gyrus* 157 (28) 242 (27)a 498 (52)ab
CA1* 35 (10) 27 (9)a 7 (2)a
CA3* 95 (13) 164 (18)a 298 (37)ab
V. Hipp./ Sub. zone* 16(2) 18 (3) 27 (3)a
NGF
Dentate Gyrus* 47 (5) 42 (5) 68 (6)ab
CA1 # 5 (1) 7(1)a 7(1)a
CA3 5 (1) 6 (1) 8 (1)
NT3
Dentate Gyrus 57 (6) 49 (5) 49 (4)
trkB
Dentate Gyrus 92 (5) 89 (7) 98 (6)
CA1 55 (2) 54 (3) 59 (4)
CA3 31 (3) 30 (3) 32 (4)
trkA
CA1 6 (1) 5 (1) 5 (2)
CA3 11 (3) 19 (5) 17 (5)

Mean relative CRH, CRH-R1, BDNF, NGF, NT3, trkB, and trkA mRNA expression levels (mean integrated grey values/100 +/− 1 SEM; presented as arbitrary units) measured in several brain regions from control, increased complexity, and exercise rats immediately following final (day 11) noise stress.

*

significant one way ANOVA, p < 0.05.

a

indicates a difference from controls,

b

indicates a significant difference from increased complexity animals, Tukey HSD, p < 0.05.

#

independent samples t-test in which X and IC values were grouped together, p < 0.05. (MeA- medial amygdala; BLA-basolateral amygdala; v. hipp- ventral hippocampus; sub. zone- subicular zone; PVN-paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus).