Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2010 Sep 6;101(5):746–754. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.08.017

Table 2.

Cluster analysis of shuttle box escape responses (mean escape latency in sec ± SEM).

Rats which received open-field, sucrose-consumption, and passive-avoidance tests:
Helpless (N = 10) Non-helpless (N = 11) Total sample (N = 21)
FR1 11.89 ± 0.62* 3.53 ± 0.46 7.51 ±1.00
FR2 28.13 ± 0.82* 8.54 ±1.30 17.87 ± 2.32
Control rats which did not receive behavioral-screening tests:
Helpless (N = 12) Non-helpless (N = 9) Total sample (N = 21)
FR1 12.99 ± 0.39* 5.83 ± 1.07 9.92 ± 0.93
FR2 28.23 ± 0.67* 11.17 ± 1.54 20.92 ± 2.03
*

p < 0.01, helpless vs. non-helpless