Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 17;13(4):384–397. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0074-z

Table 3.

Effect sizes in studies assessing self-reported internalizing, externalizing and total problem behavior in children with parental CMC

Author N Parental CMC Instrument % girls Mean age child d int. d ext. d tot.
Biggar and Forehand (1998) 85 HIV/AIDS CDI 59.00 8.68 .39
Diareme et al. (2006) 27 MS YSR 37.04 13.00 .59 .62 .59
Harris and Zakowski (2003) 27 Cancer CDI/RCMAS 66.70 15.40 −.16
Pakenham and Bursnall (2006) 48 MS BSI-18 56.00 15.60 .13
Rodrigue and Houck (2001) 29 Mixed YSR 48.00 12.60 .40
Siegel et al. (1996) 70 Cancer CDI/STAI 57.00 10.80 .53
Tompkins and Wyatt (2008) 23 HIV/AIDS YSR 61.00 12.59 .50 .80
Visser et al. (2007) 66 Cancer YSR 52.70 15.00 −.04 −.15 −.08
Visser et al. (2005) 222 Cancer YSR 53.03 15.00 .21 .26 .11
Watson et al. (2006) 56 Cancer YSR 69.64 15.00 .25 .14 .09
Welch et al. (1996) 55 Cancer YSR 60.00 14.50 .36 .24

N sample size, CMC chronic medical condition, MS multiple sclerosis, CDI child depression inventory, RCMAS revised children’s manifest anxiety scale, YSR youth self-report, CBCL child behavior checklist, BSI-18 brief symptom inventory-18, STAI state-trait anxiety inventory, d Cohen’s d (effect size), int. internalizing problem behavior, ext. externalizing problem behavior, tot. total problem behavior