Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 7;19(4):338–341. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031898

Table 2.

Tobacco point-of-sale advertising prevalence. 2008

Guatemala City, Guatemala Buenos Aires, Argentina
Neighbourhood socioeconomic status Neighbourhood socioeconomic status
All High Middle Low All High Middle Low
120 40 40 40 p* 120 40 40 40 p
Stores (%) with exterior ads 3 10 0 0 0.08 10 0 15 14 0.4
Stores (%) with interior ads
 None 40 22 48 52 <0.001 18 10 18 35 0.07
 1–2 34 32 50 22 47 45 55 50
 3–9 23 46 2 25 28 45 26 19
Stores (%) with interior ads that can be seen from the outside 18 10 48 47 0.005 61 91 77 72 0.1
Mean (%,SD) of the total percentage of space occupied in front of the client 18.28 (8.37) 13.57 (4.22) 17.37 (5.37) 0.04 21.47 (15.20) 21.94 (20.39) 26.67 (13.73) 0.5
Stores (%) with tobacco ads/products <50 cm of confectionary 60 77 38 66 0.002 52 57 28 54 0.03
Stores (%) with ‘No smoking’ signs 88 26 2 2 0.002 20 24 16 3 0.1
Stores (%) with ‘No sales to minors’ sign 8 13 2 0 0.08 57 61 66 31 0.1
Stores (%) within 100 metres of a school 63 26 70 97 <0.001 5 3 13 0 0.03
*

p Value for difference between socioeconomic status.

Percentages do not add up to 100% owing to rounding.

%, SD: Refers to the mean and the SD of the total percentage of space that the cigarette counter occupied in front of the client.