TABLE 1.
Parameter | Point estimate | 95% confidence limit |
|
---|---|---|---|
Upper | Lower | ||
Kg (h−1) | 1.3078 | 1.17 | 1.47 |
Nmax (108 CFU/ml) | 8.3357 | 6.886 | 10.715 |
Kk (h−1) | 2.79 | 2.5 | 3.05 |
C50k (mg/liter) | 0.51 | 0.22 | 0.68 |
C50b (mg/liter) | 40.31 | — | |
H | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.62 |
C50a (mg/liter) | 962.19 | 367.2 | 2615 |
Ha | 0.592 | 0.542 | 0.662 |
Log N50 (CFU/ml) | 6.55 | — | |
Q | 0.8 | — |
Kg, growth rate constant for bacterial population; Nmax, maximum population size; Kk, maximal kill rate constant for bacterial population; C50k, concentration to achieve 50% maximal kill rate of the initial population; C50b, concentration to achieve 50% maximal kill rate of the most resistant population; H, sigmoidicity constant for bacterial population; C50a, concentration to achieve 50% maximal adaptation rate; Ha, sigmoidicity constant for bacterial adaptation; N50, bacterial population in which 50% drug concentration is in effect; Q, sigmoidicity constant for effective drug concentration; —, unable to determine. The nonlinear confidence region plotting method was found to be inadequate. The sum of squares flattened off in the case of these parameters.