Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 1;76(22):7653–7657. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00820-10

TABLE 1.

Comparison of results from three methods for screening and confirmation of C. botulinum serotypes A, B, E, and Fa

Sample Original enriched cultures
Selectively enriched cultures
Mouse bioassay result ELISA results
Real-time PCR results
ELISA results
Real-time PCR results
A B E F A B E F A B E F A B E F
Positive control + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Negative control
CMM samples
    Sample 4 + + + + + +
    Sample 8 + + + + + + + +
    Sample 10 + + + + +
    Sample 12 + + + + + + +
    Sample 14 + + + + + + + +
    Sample 16 + + + + + + + + + +
TPGY samples
    Sample 4 + + + + ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Sample 8 + ND ND ND ND + ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Sample 10 + + + ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Sample 12 + + + ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Sample 14 + + + ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Sample 16 + + + ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
a

Original enriched cultures used water samples enriched in CMM or TPGY; selectively enriched cultures were enriched on BSM solid medium. +, positive; −, negative; ND, data not determined for these samples.