TABLE 2.
Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance profiles in MboI-resistant versus MboI-susceptible C. coli isolates from swine
| AMR profilea | No. (%) of isolates with: |
|
|---|---|---|
| MboI-resistant DNA (n = 46) | MboI-susceptible DNA (n = 62) | |
| Pan sensitive | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| T | 0 (0) | 4 (6) |
| SE | 2 (4) | 0 (0) |
| TE | 12 (26) | 13 (21) |
| TK | 1 (2) | 2 (3) |
| TS | 1 (2) | 5 (8) |
| TEK | 1 (2) | 9 (15) |
| TSE | 20 (43) | 16 (26) |
| TSK | 1 (2) | 6 (10) |
| TSEK | 8 (17) | 7 (11) |
a
AMR, antimicrobial resistance; T, tetracycline; S, streptomycin; E, erythromycin; K, kanamycin. “AMR profile” refers to resistance phenotypes. Thus, “T” indicates isolates with resistance only to tetracycline, “TE” indicates isolates with resistance to both tetracycline and erythromycin (but susceptible to the other antibiotics in the panel), etc. “Pan sensitive” indicates isolates that were susceptible to all antibiotics in the panel.