Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: Plant J. 2008 Apr 22;55(4):568–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03527.x

Table 2.

Estimates of free-running periods for CAB2:LUC, CCR2:LUC, and TOC1:LUC expression, and the proportion of seedlings exhibiting detectable rhythms in WT and axr6-3 backgrounds

Genotype CAB2:LUCa
 CCR2:LUCa
 TOC1:LUCa
Period ± SDb (h) Rhythmic/total Period ± SDb (h) Rhythmic/total Period ± SDb (h) Rhythmic/total
WT 24.2 ± 0.6 25/26 23.6 ±0.6 18/18 24.0 ± 0.5 26/26
axr6-3 25.6± 0.8 23/27 25.0 ± 0.7 24/25 27.2±1.4 19/29

Plants were entrained for 6 days under 12 h light:12 h dark cycles at 22°C, then held in continuous white light (50 µmol m−2 sec−1) at 22°C for 5 days.

a

Data are from two independent replicates.

b

The variance-weighted mean period was determined as described previously (Millar et al., 1995b; Plautz et al., 1997). Only those period estimates with relative amplitude error values ≤0.6 and period estimates between 20 and 30 h were included in this analysis. SD, standard deviation.