. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Cogn Dev. 2010 OCT–DEC;25(4):380–393. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.08.007

Table 2.

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Models for Maternal Reminiscing Codes Predicting Self-Representations

Variable	Self-representations
	Trait Self				Evaluative Self
	Wald χ²(1)	B	SE	φ²	Wald χ²(1)	B	SE	φ²
Step 1
Culture	5.35^*	1.53	.66	.046	4.75^*	2.31	1.06	.041
	R² = .10^**				R² = .14^**
Step 2
Internal State Language Model
Culture	3.33^†	1.24	.68	.029	3.20^†	1.93	1.08	.028
ISL-positive event	.29	.03	.05	.003
ISL-negative event	4.04^*	.10	.05	.036	8.84^**	.17	.06	.078
	R² = .17^**				R² = .29^****
Attributions Model
Culture					4.07^*	2.16	1.07	.036
AT-negative event					4.99^*	.21	.09	.044
					R² = .21^***
Explanations Model
Culture	4.16^*	1.37	.67	.036	4.11^*	2.16	1.07	.036
EX-positive event	2.17	.13	.09	.019
EX-negative event					1.90	.14	.10	.017
	R² = .12^*				R² = .16^**

Note. ISL = Internal state language; AT = Attributions; EX = Explanations. φ² = χ²(1)/N.

^†

p < .10

p < .05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001

^****

p < .0001.