Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Stud (Camb). 2010 Nov;64(3):293–306. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2010.510200

Table 3.

Husband’s migration and wife’s autonomy: examining the success of husband’s migration

1 2
Husband’s migration
 Cumulative years away (log) 0.220* (2.030) 0.231* (2.130)
Current migration status based on remittances
 Successful migrant (ref=non-migrant) 0.854*** (4.170)
 Unsuccessful migrant (ref=non-migrant) 0.801*** (3.730)
Current migration status based on wife’s perception
 Successful migrant (ref=non-migrant) 0.677** (3.140)
 Unsuccessful migrant (ref=non-migrant) 0.985*** (4.600)
Wife’s activities
 Wife’s cumulative years work (log) 0.349** (3.110) 0.343** (3.060)
 Wife’s children born between 2000–2006 0.020 (0.340) 0.022 (0.360)
 Wife co-resides with in-laws −0.438*** (−3.360) −0.434*** (−3.340)
Controls
 Wife’s age 0.047** (2.760) 0.048** (2.800)
 Wife has 1–4 years education (ref=no education) −0.098 (−0.660) −0.082 (−0.550)
 Wife has 5+ years education (ref=no education) −0.110 (−0.580) −0.084 (−0.440)
 Wife is husband’s only or first spouse −0.192 (−0.850) −0.181 (−0.800)
 Wife’s marital autonomy at time of marriage 0.012 (0.170) 0.007 (0.100)
 Age wife started living with husband −0.012 (−0.600) −0.012 (−0.630)
 Mainline religion (ref=no religion) 0.170 (0.810) 0.160 (0.750)
 Other religion (ref=no religion) 0.223 (1.240) 0.216 (1.200)
 Husband’s age −0.006 (−0.450) −0.006 (−0.440)
 Husband has 1–4 years education (ref=no education) 0.023 (0.120) 0.037 (0.200)
 Husband has 5+ years education (ref=no education) 0.027 (0.130) 0.045 (0.220)
Intercept 1 −4.813*** (−7.610) −4.870*** (−7.740)
Intercept 2 0.127 (0.210) 0.085 (0.140)
Random effects (Village-level variance) .260* .266*
N 1678 1678
*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001, two tailed tests.

Numbers in parentheses are significance statistics (z-ratios).

Source: As for Table 1