Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Jun 2;68(5):674–679. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.089904

Table 1.

Change in cartilage morphology (in the right knee) over 1 year for the total subcohort, and for women and men, respectively

All (n = 156) Women (n = 79) Men (n = 77)



MC% SRM p Value MC% SRM p Value MC% SRM p Value
MT VC −0.42 −0.12 0.13 −0.40 −0.13 0.25 −0.44 −0.12 0.28
ThCtAB −0.52 −0.16 0.04* −0.46 −0.14 0.22 −0.58 −0.18 0.11
ThCcAB −0.34 −0.12 0.14 −0.23 −0.08 0.47 −0.44 −0.15 0.19
cAB −0.19 −0.11 0.19 −0.31 −0.14 0.22 −0.11 −0.07 0.56
cMF VC −1.49 −0.21 0.008* −1.14 −0.18 0.12 −1.74 −0.25 0.03*
ThCtAB −1.92 −0.30 <0.001* −1.69 −0.26 0.02* −2.12 −0.34 0.004*
ThCcAB −1.46 −0.26 0.002* −1.34 −0.23 0.047* −1.56 −0.28 0.02*
cAB −0.47 −0.12 0.14 −0.20 −0.06 0.61 −0.69 −0.17 0.15
MFTC VC −0.79 −0.22 0.007* −0.66 −0.19 0.10 −0.88 −0.25 0.03*
ThCtAB −1.23 −0.31 <0.001* −1.08 −0.26 0.03* −1.37 −0.37 0.002*
LT VC −0.55 −0.17 0.03* −0.55 −0.14 0.21 −0.55 −0.20 0.08
ThCtAB −0.68 −0.23 0.005* −0.76 −0.21 0.07 −0.60 −0.27 0.02*
ThCcAB −0.60 −0.21 0.009* −0.68 −0.19 0.09 −0.52 −0.24 0.04*
cAB 0.03 0.02 0.78 0.15 0.11 0.32 −0.06 −0.05 0.67
cLF VC 0.02 0.01 0.95 0.67 0.13 0.27 −0.42 −0.11 0.33
ThCtAB 0.09 0.02 0.77 0.60 0.13 0.26 −0.35 −0.11 0.35
ThCcAB 0.13 0.03 0.67 0.70 0.15 0.18 −0.37 −0.12 0.30
cAB 0.01 0.00 0.95 −0.06 −0.04 0.75 0.06 0.03 0.77
LFTC VC −0.33 −0.12 0.14 −0.09 −0.02 0.83 −0.50 −0.21 0.07
ThCtAB −0.30 −0.11 0.17 −0.10 −0.03 0.80 −0.48 −0.23 0.046*

cAB, cartilage-covered bone area; cLF, weight-bearing lateral femoral condyle; cMF, weight-bearing medial femoral condyle; LFTC, lateral femoro-tibial compartment; LT, lateral tibia; MC%, mean change (in %); MFTC, medial femoro-tibial compartment; MT, medial tibia; SRM, standardised response mean (mean change/SD of change); ThCcAB, thickness of the cartilage over the entire cAB; ThCtAB, thickness of the cartilage over the entire subchondral bone area; VC, volume of cartilage.

*

p Values <0.05 for paired t test between baseline and 1 year, without correcting for multiple testing, showing that the rate of loss was significantly different from zero.