Table 3.
K-L grade 0 (n = 17) | K-L grade 2 (n = 56) | K-L grade 3 (n = 47) | K-L grade 4 (n = 7) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC% | SRM | p Value |
MC% | SRM | p Value | MC% | SRM | p Value | MC% | SRM | p Value |
|
MT | −0.70 | −0.33 | 0.19 | −0.58 | −0.18 | 0.19 | −0.58 | −0.14 | 0.35 | −0.13 | −0.07 | 0.85 |
cMF | −1.12 | −0.43 | 0.10 | −1.82 | −0.29 | 0.04* | −4.04 | −0.51 | 0.001* | 4.46 | 0.34 | 0.40 |
MFTC | −0.92 | −0.46 | 0.07 | −1.23 | −0.30 | 0.03* | −2.24 | −0.46 | 0.003* | 2.07 | 0.33 | 0.42 |
LT | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.89 | −0.80 | −0.27 | 0.047* | −1.26 | −0.37 | 0.01* | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.68 |
cLF | −0.16 | −0.07 | 0.79 | −0.19 | −0.05 | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.90 | 2.15 | 0.43 | 0.30 |
LFTC | −0.03 | −0.02 | 0.92 | −0.50 | −0.18 | 0.18 | −0.58 | −0.19 | 0.20 | 1.28 | 0.42 | 0.31 |
p Values <0.05 for paired t test between baseline and 1 year, without correcting for multiple testing, showing that the rate of loss was significantly different from zero.
For abbreviations see table 1.