Skip to main content
. 2008 May 13;9(2):628–634. doi: 10.1208/s12249-008-9080-6

Table IV.

Comparative Grades for Assessment of Efficiency of Self-microemulsification Based in the Dispersibility, Appearance and Time of Microemulsification

Composition Formulation (g)
ME1 ME2 ME3 ME4 ME5
Exemestane 25 mg 25 mg 25 mg 25 mg 25 mg
Cremophore ELP 755 mg 640 mg 690 mg 430 mg 370 mg
Transcutol HP 125 mg 220 mg 110 mg 70 mg 130 mg
Caproyl 90 120 mg 140 mg 200 mg 500 mg 500 mg
Assessment of SMEDDS diluted with deionized water
 Visual observation grade I I I I/II I/II
 Droplet size (after 0.5 h) nm 12.3 14.1 25.6 28.5 31.0
 Polydispersity index (after 0.5 h) 0.11 0.23 0.08 0.06 0.02
 Zeta potential (after 0.5 h) mv −2.2 −7.3 −0.7 −9.7 −5.4
 Droplet size (after 24 h) nm 12.8 14.3 27 29.6 32.3
 Polydispersity index (After 24 h) 0.04 0.05 0.37 0.09 0.08
 Zeta potential (after 24 h) mv −1.8 −7.1 −0.9 −10.8 −4.2
Assessment of SMEDDS diluted with 0.1 N HCl
 Visual observation grade I I I I/II II
 Droplet size (after 0.5 h) nm 14.1 13.7 22.9 28.1 30.1
 Polydispersity index (after 0.5 h) 0.07 0.01 0.08 0.23 0.18
 Zeta potential (after 0.5 h) mv −2.7 −6.9 −1.0 −10.6 −5.9
 Droplet size (after 24 h) nm 15.3 16.3 28.1 29.2 32.8
 Polydispersity index (after 24 h) 0.11 0.15 0.08 0.03 0.34
 Zeta potential (after 24 h) mv −2.9 −7.8 −1.6 −11.8 −4.1