Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Aug;70(4):867–879. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.4.867

Table 2.

Unbiased Hedges g Effect Sizes: Cognitive-Processing Therapy (CPT), Prolonged Exposure (PE), and Minimal Attention (MA)

CPT vs. PEc
Measure CPT vs. MAa
(posttreatment)
PE vs. MAb
(posttreatment)
Posttreatment 3 months 9 months
Intent-to-treat sample
CAPS 0.97 0.74 0.14 0.18 0.10
PSS 1.22 0.74 0.29 0.21 0.20
BDI 0.84 0.57 0.24 0.22 0.16
Global guiltd 0.79 0.47 0.25 0.28
Hindsight bias 0.79 0.37 0.36 0.44
Lack of justification 0.78 0.31 0.46 0.40
Wrongdoing 0.64 0.31 0.32 0.34

Completer sample
CAPS 2.78 2.05 0.24 0.33 –0.30
PSS 2.70 1.76 0.43 0.31 0.10
BDI 2.09 1.18 0.51 0.59 0.06
Global guilt 1.90 1.32 0.47 0.56
Hindsight bias 2.02 1.04 1.00 1.03
Lack of justification 1.79 0.73 1.06 0.69
Wrongdoing 1.30 0.77 0.59 0.48

Note. CAPS = Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; PSS = PTSD Symptom Scale; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder.

a

Positive effect sizes indicate that participants in the CPT condition evidenced greater symptomatic improvement than participants in the MA condition.

b

Positive effect sizes indicate that participants in the PE condition evidenced greater symptomatic improvement than participants in the MA condition.

c

Positive effect sizes indicate that participants in the CPT condition evidenced greater symptomatic improvement than participants in the PE condition. Negative effect sizes indicate that participants in the PE condition evidenced greater symptomatic improvement than participants in the CPT condition.

d

Measures of guilt were not assessed at 3 months posttreatment.