Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 9;341:c5943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5943

Table 3.

 Sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals of four methods* used to detect or exclude endobronchial intubation estimated with linear random effects models to allow for correlation within patients

Auscultation Observation Depth All three
Sensitivity† (95% CI) 65 (49 to 81) 43 (25 to 60) 88 (75 to 100) 100‡
Specificity (95% CI) 93 (84 to 100) 90 (81 to 100) 98 (93 to 100.0) 95 (88 to 100)

*Bilateral auscultation of chest; observation of symmetrical chest movements; checking cm scale (depth); or combination of all three.

†P<0.001 for difference between methods.

‡Confidence interval not estimable.