Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 9;341:c5943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5943

Table 4.

 Influence of anaesthetist’s experience* on detecting or excluding endobronchial intubation by four methods† (n=20 in each group)

Tube position and diagnosis Auscultation Observation Depth All three
Endobronchial position:
 First year correct/incorrect 9/11 7/13 17/3 20/0
 Experienced correct/incorrect 17/3 10/10 18/2 20/0
Tracheal position:
 First year correct/incorrect 18/2 16/4 20/0 18/2
 Experienced correct/incorrect 19/1 20/0 19/1 20/0
Odds ratio‡ (95% CI) 10.0 (1.4 to 434), P=0.01 4.5 (0.9 to 42.8), P=0.065 1.0 (0.1 to 13.8), P=0.99 P=0.5§

*Experienced=anaesthetists with at least 2 years of training in anaesthetics; first year=residents with maximum of 1 year of training in anaesthetics.

†Bilateral auscultation of chest; observation of symmetrical chest movements; checking cm scale (depth); or combination of all three.

‡Matched odds ratio for correct diagnosis of experienced v inexperienced anaesthetists with 95% confidence interval and exact McNemar’s significance probability.

§Odds ratio and 95% CI not estimable.