Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2010 Sep 14;72(9):862–873. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181f61863

TABLE 3.

Associations between serum folate, vitamin B-12, total homocysteine levels and PHQ score: Multiple logistic and zero-inflated poisson regression modelsa

PHQ score≥10
PHQ continuous score
All Men Women All Men Women

OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI β±SEE β±SEE β±SEE
MODEL 1c (n=2,388) (n=1,030) (n=1,358) (n=2,388) (n=1,030) (n=1,358)
Serum folate, ng/mL
 T1 : 7.02±0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ref Ref Ref
 T2 : 12.0±0.06 0.74(0.52; 1.06) 0.62(0.27; 1.40) 0.82(0.48; 1.38) −0.03±0.04 −0.10±0.07 0.01±0.07
 T3 : 21.1±0.29 0.43(0.27; 0.69) b 0.76(0.42; 1.39) 0.31(0.13; 0.72) b −0.20±0.06b −0.14±0.07b −0.22±0.09b
Serum vitamin B-12, pg/mL
 T1 : 289.2±3.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ref Ref Ref
 T2 : 467.1±2.5 0.88(0.54; 1.41) 1.03(0.47; 2.25) 0.80(0.38; 1.66) −0.07±0.07 0.02±0.10 −0.13±0.11
 T3 : 807.2±10.1 0.97(0.61; 1.57) 0.95(0.36; 2.53) 1.03(0.52; 2.02) +0.00±0.07 0.08±0.12 −0.05±0.11
Serum total homocysteine, μmol/L
 T1 : 5.5±0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ref Ref Ref
 T2 : 7.6±0.03 0.92(0.57; 1.48) 1.12(0.52; 2.43) 0.93(0.52; 1.69) −0.06±0.07 0.04±0.08 −0.10±0.08
 T3 : 11.5±0.2 1.11(0.64; 1.90) 1.59(0.55; 4.60) 0.95(0.49; 1.81) +0.01±0.09 0.07±0.13 −0.00±0.10
MODEL 2d (n=2,178) (n=918) (n=1,260) (n=2,178) (n=918) (n=1,260)
Serum folate, ng/mL
 T1 : 7.02±0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ref Ref Ref
 T2 : 12.0±0.06 0.79(0.55; 1.12) 0.55(0.24; 1.25) 0.94(0.52; 1.69) −0.00±0.04 −0.08±0.10 0.05±0.08
 T3 : 21.1±0.29 0.52(0.35; 0.76) b 0.85(0.41; 1.74) 0.37(0.17; 0.80) b −0.13±0.05b −0.06±0.09 −0.17±0.07b
Serum vitamin B-12, pg/mL
 T1 : 289.2±3.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ref Ref Ref
 T2 : 467.1±2.5 0.92(0.56; 1.53) 0.95(0.46; 1.96) 0.86(0.38; 1.93) −0.07±0.08 0.00±0.10 −0.13±0.10
 T3 : 807.2±10.1 1.09(0.71; 1.69) 1.04(0.37; 2.87) 1.15(0.63; 2.10) +0.03±0.06 0.08±0.12 −0.02±0.10
Serum total homocysteine, μmol/L
 T1 : 5.5±0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ref Ref Ref
 T2 : 7.6±0.03 1.00(0.56; 1.70) 1.33(0.64; 2.77) 0.97(0.46; 2.06) −0.06±0.07 0.08±0.08 −0.12±0.07
 T3 : 11.5±0.2 1.15(0.65; 2.03) 1.74(0.51; 5.89) 1.02(0.51; 1.02) +0.01±0.08 0.10±0.16 −0.00±0.09

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; Met=Metabolic Equivalent; NHANES=National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OR=odds ratio; Ref=Referent category; SEE=Standard error of the estimate; T=tertile.

a

Values are odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals or β±SEE. Sampling design complexity is taken into account in all analyses.

b

P<0.05 for null hypothesis that β=0 or Loge(OR)=0 based on Wald test.

c

Model 1 included all three exposures simultaneously and adjusted only for socio-demographic factors: age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational level and poverty income ratio.

d

Model 2 is model 1 but additionally adjusted for other potential confounders: Lifestyle and health-related factors (smoking status, BMI, physical activity: Mets.hr.wk−1, recoded as “0–<5”; “5–10”; “>10”) and dietary intakes (total energy intake (as is), alcohol, caffeine, vitamin B-6, β-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E and n-3 HUFA intakes, expressed as tertiles).