Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 11.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(17):3107–3110. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605235

Table 1.

Optimization of the Michael reaction.

graphic file with name nihms248707t1.jpg

Entry Catalyst Conditions[a] Yield[b] ee [%][c]
1 A DBU, THF 6
2 A KN(SiMe3)2, THF[d] 11
3 A iPr2EtN, THF, 45°C 50
4 B iPr2EtN, toluene/THF[e] 61
5 C iPr2EtN, toluene/THF[e,f] 61 93
6 C Et3N (0.1 m), toluene/THF[e] 62 93
7 C iPr2EtN (0.1 m), CH2Cl2, −20°C 49 93
8 D iPr2EtN (0.1 m), toluene/THF[e] 53 99
9 D iPr2EtN (0.05 m), toluene/THF[e] 66 99
10 D iPr2EtN (0.05 m), CH2Cl2 68 99
11 D[g] iPr2EtN (0.05 m), CH2Cl2 68 99
[a]

Base (20 mol %), 1a (0.2 m) at 23°C unless otherwise noted. DBU = 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene.

[b]

Yield of isolated product.

[c]

Determined by HPLC (Chiracel AD-H). Absolute and relative configuration of 3 assigned by X-ray crystallography.[16] See the Supporting Information for details.

[d]

Carbene generated prior to addition of substrate.

[e]

10:1 toluene/THF.

[f]

Base (1.2 equiv).

[g]

D (10 mol %). [g]