Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jul 23;4(4):372–380. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0139-5

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by category of social connectedness

Category of Overall Social Connectedness1

N Low
(5–12)
620
Low-
Medium
(13–15)
1171
Medium
(16–18)
1377
Medium-
High
(19–20)
709
High
(21–26)
467

Characteristic2 -Mean (SD) or %-3
Age, y 59 (9) 58 (10) 59 (10) 59 (10) 59 (9)
Time since diagnosis, y 6 (3) 6 (3) 6 (3) 6 (1) 6 (3)
BMI at social support assessment, kg/m2 25.4 (4.8) 25.7 (5.1) 25.5 (4.7) 25.95 (4.7) 25.7 (4.5)
Education
    Less than high school 8 9 8 8 7
    High School 43 42 44 45 40
    Some college 23 23 23 24 27
    College graduate 25 27 24 23 25
Smoker 26 20 16 12 8
Marital Status
    Yes 62 70 70 71 70
    No 38 30 29 28 28
Parity
  Nulliparous 19 15 10 9 6
  1 to 2 42 42 37 32 29
  3 to 5 36 38 48 49 52
  ≥6 3 4 5 9 12
Post-menopausal 75 69 73 73 76
Localized disease 63 65 66 66 65
Treatment
    Radiation 49 50 52 49 48
    Chemotherapy 31 34 32 31 37
    Tamoxifen 55 57 61 59 60
1

Summary score estimating relative frequency of contact with confidants, frequency of attending religious services, frequency of attending community group(s), and number of children, relatives, and friends seen at least once per month[35]

2

Characteristics assessed at breast cancer diagnosis unless otherwise noted.

3

Percents don’t sum to 100% due to missing values.