Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Nurs Adm. 2007 Jul–Aug;37(7-8):335–342. doi: 10.1097/01.nna.0000285119.53066.ae

Table 2.

Characteristics of the Sample of Pennsylvania Hospitals Overall and by Proportion of Nonpermanent Nurses*

Proportion of Supplemental/Float Nurses
Hospital Characteristics All (n = 198) <5%
n = 61
5%–15%
n = 109
>15%
n = 28
P value
Teaching hospitals, % 37.5 32.0 39.6 40.0 .637
Hospital size, %
 Small (≤100 beds) 23.3 22.0 20.8 36.0 .194
 Medium (101–250 beds) 56.3 64.0 53.5 52.0
 Large (>250 beds) 20.4 14.0 25.7 12.0
High-technology hospitals, % 29.0 22.0 33.7 24.0 .278
Resource adequacy, mean (SD) 2.20 (.28) 2.28 (0.26)a 2.21 (0.25)a 1.98 (0.29)b <.001

P values reflect the significance of the difference in percentages across the 3 supplemental/float nurse categories generally. Percentages in the same rows that share the same letter are not significantly different at P <.05.

*

Authors’ analysis of data from the 1999 Pennsylvania Hospital Outcomes Study.