Table 2.
Characteristics of the Sample of Pennsylvania Hospitals Overall and by Proportion of Nonpermanent Nurses*
| Proportion of Supplemental/Float Nurses |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Characteristics | All (n = 198) | <5% n = 61 |
5%–15% n = 109 |
>15% n = 28 |
P value |
| Teaching hospitals, % | 37.5 | 32.0 | 39.6 | 40.0 | .637 |
| Hospital size, % | |||||
| Small (≤100 beds) | 23.3 | 22.0 | 20.8 | 36.0 | .194 |
| Medium (101–250 beds) | 56.3 | 64.0 | 53.5 | 52.0 | |
| Large (>250 beds) | 20.4 | 14.0 | 25.7 | 12.0 | |
| High-technology hospitals, % | 29.0 | 22.0 | 33.7 | 24.0 | .278 |
| Resource adequacy, mean (SD) | 2.20 (.28) | 2.28 (0.26)a | 2.21 (0.25)a | 1.98 (0.29)b | <.001 |
P values reflect the significance of the difference in percentages across the 3 supplemental/float nurse categories generally. Percentages in the same rows that share the same letter are not significantly different at P <.05.
Authors’ analysis of data from the 1999 Pennsylvania Hospital Outcomes Study.