Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug;10(6):575–583. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0222

Table 2.

Mean% Difference (±1 Standard Error) and Paired t-Test of Estimated Standing Prevalence from Comparison of Less Frequent Sampling with Monthly Estimates of Estimated Standing Prevalence (Monthly, Mean, and Weighted Mean)

 
Grid 11
Grid 12
  Monthly Mean Weighted mean Monthly Mean Weighted mean
Bi-monthly
 % difference 0.221 −0.021 0.098 0.872 1.036 1.033
 SE 0.092 0.294 0.277 0.604 0.914 1.010
t1,84 2.413 0.073 0.355 1.435 1.127 1.017
P 0.018 0.942 0.724 0.155 0.263 0.312
Quarterly
 % difference 1.048 1.233 1.394 0.371 1.050 0.893
 SE 0.445 0.772 0.863 0.255 0.650 0.661
t1,56 2.355 1.597 1.615 1.440 1.601 1.340
p 0.022 0.116 0.112 0.155 0.115 0.186
Semiannually
 % difference 0.652 0.752 0.683 0.742 2.303 2.335
 SE 0.251 0.842 0.734 0.505 1.637 1.516
t1,26 2.555 0.879 0.913 1.443 1.382 1.514
p 0.016 0.387 0.369 0.160 0.178 0.141
Annually
 % difference 0.965 2.602 2.887 1.494 5.439 5.319
 SE 0.361 1.633 1.576 1.027 3.230 3.167
t1,12 2.579 1.535 1.765 1.402 1.622 1.618
p 0.023 0.149 0.101 0.184 0.129 0.130

Positive and negative values indicate that ESP was on average overestimated and underestimated, respectively. Significant differences are shown in bold. ESP, estimated standing prevalence; SE, standard error.