TABLE 2.
PAPAL |
PAMVPA |
|||||
PAlow | Underreporter (n = 1486, 51.8%) | Plausible reporter (n = 1087, 37.9%) | Overreporter (n = 295, 10.3%) | Underreporter (n = 1065, 37.1%) | Plausible reporter (n = 1217, 42.4%) | Overreporter (n = 586, 20.4%) |
Underreporter (n = 1476, 51.5%) | 88.0 | 15.5 | 0 | 97.4 | 36.1 | 0 |
Plausible reporter (n = 1170, 40.8%) | 12.0 | 78.8 | 45.8 | 2.6 | 63.5 | 63.0 |
Overreporter (n = 222, 7.7%) | 0 | 5.7 | 54.2 | 0 | 0.4 | 37.0 |
PAlow, physical activity coefficients assigned as low-active; PAPAL, physical activity coefficients obtained from estimated physical activity levels; PAMVPA, physical activity coefficients obtained from minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Bowker's Test of Symmetry was significant (P < 0.001), which indicated that there were different proportions of children in the energy-reporting categories between PAlow (based on a low-active PA coefficient), PAPAL (based on PAL values), and the PAMVPA (based on accelerometer data). The κ coefficient for interrater reliability was 0.66 (“substantial agreement”) between PAlow and PAPAL and was 0.53 (“moderate agreement”) between PAlow and PAMVPA.