Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 27;92(6):1452–1460. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29955

TABLE 4.

Multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) for risk of hip and total fractures based on dietary n−6:n−31

No. of subjects Hip fracture
Total fracture
n−6:n−3 Quartile HR (95% CI)2 P HR (95% CI)3 P HR (95% CI)2 P HR (95% CI)3 P
1 (0.49, 6.433) 34,199 1.00 0.180 1.00 0.726 1.00 <0.001 1.00 0.001
2 (6.434, 7.664) 34,225 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) 0.93 (0.79, 1.09) 0.92 (0.88, 0.96) 0.93 (0.89, 0.98)
3 (7.665, 8.898) 34,216 1.09 (0.95, 1.25) 1.04 (0.89, 1.23) 0.91 (0.88, 0.95) 0.92 (0.88, 0.97)
4 (8.900, 39.01)4 34,208 1.05 (0.92, 1.21) 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) 0.92 (0.89, 0.96) 0.92 (0.88, 0.97)
1

HRs and 95% CIs were obtained from Cox proportional hazard models. P values are from tests for linear trend.

2

Models were adjusted for age, ethnicity, and total energy intake.

3

Models were adjusted for age, ethnicity, total energy intake, education, marital status, family history of fracture, fracture on or after age 55 y, number of falls in past year, height, weight, total vitamin D intake, hormone therapy history, antianxiety or antidepressant medication use, bisphosphonate use, corticosteroid use, smoking status, arthritis, depression, general health assessment, parity, treated diabetes, weekly exercise, and total calcium intake.

4

The maximum n−6:n−3 ratio was 39.01, but the 99th percentile was 14.1.