Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008 Jan 15;72(2):493–505. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.008

Table 1.

Comparison of X-ray diffraction data for various mackinawite phases

hkl Synthetic Mka Synthetic MkAb Synthetic MkBb Crystalline Mkc
d (Å) I/Io (%) d (Å) I/Io (%) d (Å) I/Io (%) d (Å) I/Io (%)
001 5.196 100 6.60 100 5.48 100 5.0328 100
101 2.989 42 3.33 51 3.36 41 2.9672 50
110 2.617 4 2.84 27 2.58 7 2.5976 8
111 2.323 38 2.42 41 2.3 47 2.3082 70
200 1.845 37 2.00 35 1.95 10 1.8368 38
112 1.809 92 1.88 52 1.83 29 1.8074 82
201 1.730 19 1.77 50 1.73 23 1.7254 29
003 1.84 44 1.81 30 1.6776 9
211 1.579 16 1.63 21 1.57 12 1.5617 12
103 1.5260 6
220 1.306 14 1.2988 11
a

Non-magnetic portion of synthetic mackinawite aged for 3 days (this study).

b

Synthetic mackinawite aged for < 0.5 h (Wolthers et al., 2003).

c

Well-crystalline mackinawite (Lennie at al., 1995).