Table 4.
Risk factor | Race → risk factor | Risk factor → general arrest |
Risk factor → violent arrest |
Risk factor → theft arrest |
Risk factor → drug arrest |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Path est. | Odds ratio | Path est. | Odds ratio | Path est. | Odds ratio | Path est. | Odds ratio | ||
ADHD | .15* | −.11 | .90 | −.11 | .90 | −.15 | .86 | −.16 | 0.85 |
Oppositional defiant | −.02 | −.01 | .99 | −.04 | .96 | .03 | 1.03 | −.04 | 0.96 |
Conduct problems | .15* | .42* | 1.52 | .27* | 1.31 | .26* | 1.30 | .16 | 1.17 |
Affective problems | −.06 | −.01 | .99 | −.02 | .98 | −.02 | .98 | .09 | 1.09 |
Anxiety problems | −.06 | −.04 | .96 | −.10 | .90 | −.04 | .96 | −.05 | 0.95 |
Interpersonal callousness | .09† | .03 | 1.03 | −.03 | .97 | .06 | 1.06 | −.00 | 1.00 |
SES | −.23* | −.13* | .88 | −.06 | .94 | −.23* | .79 | −.01 | 0.99 |
Poor communication | .22* | .19* | 1.21 | .20* | 1.22 | .12 | 1.13 | .06 | 1.06 |
Physical punishment | .10* | .13* | 1.14 | .14* | 1.15 | .06 | 1.06 | .01 | 1.01 |
Peer delinquency | .24* | .16* | 1.17 | .16* | 1.17 | .05 | 1.05 | .12 | 1.13 |
Peer rejection | .12* | −.11 | .90 | .08 | 1.08 | −.11 | .90 | −.07 | 0.93 |
Low acad. achievement | −.20* | .12† | 1.13 | .17* | 1.19 | .11 | 1.12 | .16 | 1.17 |
Neighborhood disadvantage | .72* | .09 | 1.09 | .02 | 1.02 | .10 | 1.11 | .08 | 1.08 |
Neighborhood problems | .45* | .03 | 1.03 | .14* | 1.15 | −.07 | .93 | .11 | 1.12 |
Note. All predictors were standardized. Race → risk factor represents relations between race and risk factors. Risk factor → arrest represents relations between the risk factors and arrest. In these multivariate models, nonsignificant paths were found between race and general arrest (B = .07, p = .44), violence-related arrest (B = .06, p = .49), and theft arrest (B = .07, p = .40). However, race significantly predicted drug-related arrest (B = .22, p = .03). Est. = estimate; ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; SES = socioeconomic status; acad. = academic.
p < .07.
p < .05.