Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 4;54(12):5251–5256. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00226-10

TABLE 1.

Decreases in bacterial counts from TCF at day 8 and day 11 and bacterial counts recovered from CVs at day 11

Therapy regimen or groupa Bacterial count, mean log CFU/ml ± SD (no. of samples)b
TCF
CVs
Day 8 Day 11
Monotherapies
    RIF −2.59 ± 0.91 (20)** −2.75 ± 1.35 (19)* 1.69 ± 1.26 (19)*
    DAP100 −3.14 ± 0.74 (15)** −3.59 ± 0.49 (15)*** 1.88 ± 0.92 (15)
    DAP45 −2.54 ± 1.21 (25)* −2.71 ± 1.56 (22)* 2.11 ± 1.41 (22)
Combination therapies
    LNZ+RIF −2.38 ± 1.17 (20) −3.23 ± 1.45 (19) 1.76 ± 1.27 (19)
    VAN+RIF −2.62 ± 1.19 (20) −3.73 ± 1.48 (20) 1.23 ± 0.52 (20)
    DAP100+RIF −4.57 ± 0.69 (17)†† −4.58 ± 0.68 (17)†† 0.95 ± 0.13 (17)††
    DAP45+RIF −4.21 ± 0.99 (18)†† −4.38 ± 0.92 (18)† 0.91 ± 0.32 (18)††
Control 0.66 ± 1.24 (19) 1.14 ± 1.16 (11) 5.58 ± 0.97 (11)
a

RIF, rifampin; DAP100, daptomycin at 100 mg/kg/day; DAP45, daptomycin at 45 mg/kg/day; LNZ, linezolid; VAN, vancomycin.

b

Data for vancomycin and linezolid alone are not shown. All therapeutic groups performed significantly better than controls (P < 0.05). Among monotherapies, *, P < 0.05 versus linezolid; **, P < 0.05 versus linezolid and vancomycin; and ***, P < 0.05 versus linezolid, vancomycin, rifampin, and daptomycin at 45 mg/kg/day. Among combination therapies, †, P < 0.05 versus linezolid-rifampin, and ††, P < 0.05 versus linezolid-rifampin and vancomycin-rifampin.