Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Microvasc Res. 2010 Jun 22;80(3):445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.06.004

Fig 6 — Tempol treatment caused a slightly leftward shift of the MCA stress-strain curve, although not statiscally significant (A). Vessel stiffness was not changed by tempol treatment, as seen by no differences in the β-coefficient values (B). Values are mean±SEM. The MCA was cannulated between two glass cannulas in a pressure arteriograph and kept in oxygenated warm calcium-free PSS under no-flow conditions throughout the experiment (Tempol, n=10; Control, n=5).

Fig 6 — Tempol treatment caused a slightly leftward shift of the MCA stress-strain curve, although not statiscally significant (A). Vessel stiffness was not changed by tempol treatment, as seen by no differences in the β-coefficient values (B). Values are mean±SEM. The MCA was cannulated between two glass cannulas in a pressure arteriograph and kept in oxygenated warm calcium-free PSS under no-flow conditions throughout the experiment (Tempol, n=10; Control, n=5).