Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 21;277(1694):2617–2625. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0176

Table 3.

Areas of morphological transition of experiments (exp., granular n = 12, cohesive n = 24) and simulations (sim., granular N = 10 257, cohesive N = 17 679) showing the two transitions. (Simulations parameters (granular: η2 = 0.237, c2 = c3 = 12.74, η3 = 0.95, ηS = 0.313, cS = 15.46; cohesive: η2 = 0.639, c2 = c3 = 5.969, η3 = 0.95, ηS = 0.239, cS = 14.614).)

mean ± s.d.
granular (exp.) granular (sim.) cohesive (exp.) cohesive (sim.)
AM 20.32 ± 7.82 19.55 ± 4.09 15.49 ± 6.19 17.57 ± 5.46
A1 11.94 ± 6.13 10.54 ± 4.68 5.99 ± 2.55 5.91 ± 2.52
A2 15.38 ± 6.46 14.81 ± 2.38 9.47 ± 4.51 9.69 ± 2.92