Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 5;26(23):2952–2960. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq533

Table 1.

Comparison of reference lines to published genome sequence

Illumina 1536 SNP GoldenGate OPA
ALCHEMY
BeadStudio
Line #a Agreementb Call rate Agreementb Call rate
(%) (%) (%) (%)
Nipponbare 7 99.6 99.0 96.4 99.6
9311c 7 95.6 98.0 93.3 98.4
NPx9311 F1d 6 93.6 96.7 91.7 99.8
Average 96.4 98.0 93.9 99.2
Affymetrix 44K GeneChip
ALCHEMY
BRLMM-P
Line #a Agreementb Call rate Agreementb Call rate
(%) (%) (%) (%)

Nipponbare 7 99.1 97.6 93.2 87.1
9311c 5 96.5 96.4 89.1 87.1
NPx9311 F1d 6 94.7 92.7 90.3 84.5
Average 96.9 95.6 91.1 86.2

aNumbers reported are averages across replicate samples.

bPercentage of genotype calls which agree with published sequence presuming homozygosity.

cThe 9311 line genotyped in this study was obtained from a different source than the sequenced line (see text).

dGenotypes predicted from parental genome sequence assuming normal Mendelian transmission and presuming homozygosity of the parents.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure