Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 16;277(1699):3509–3518. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0769

Table 1.

Summary of strength, height and weight assessment across seven samples. (p-values have not been corrected for family-wise error. n.a., not applicable.)

accuracy of averaged ratings (r)
individual accuracy of ratings (γ)
independent accuracy of strength, height and weight ratings γa
strength height weight strength height weight strength c/ht and c/wt height c/str and c/wt weight c/str and c/ht
sample 1: US males 0.45, p = 0.001 0.28, p = 0.028 0.32, p = 0.011 0.23, p = 10−14 0.12, p = 10−5 0.16, p = 10−11 0.21, p = 10−11 0.06, p = 0.014 −0.003, p = 0.89
sample 2: Tsimane males 0.35, p = 0.02 0.13, p = 0.41 0.22, p = 0.15 0.25, p = 10−8 0.08, p = 0.012 0.12, p = 0.0003 0.27, p = 10−6 0.04, p = 0.23 0.06, p = 0.16
sample 3: Andean males 0.46, p = 0.04 0.29, p = 0.22 0.62, p = 0.004 0.24, p = 10−5 0.15, p = 0.002 0.28, p = 10−6 0.21, p = 0.001 0.08, p = 0.13 0.16, p = 0.012
sample 4: US males 0.51, p = 0.001 0.45, p = 0.001 0.37, p = 0.008 0.30, p = 10−11 0.23, p = 10−11 0.21, p = 10−9 0.28, p = 10−8 0.14, p = 10−5 −0.01, p = 0.79
sample 5: Romanian males 0.48, p = 0.001 n.a. n.a. 0.31, p = 10−6 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
sample 6: US females 0.26, p = 0.07 0.23, p = 0.10 0.38, p = 0.006 0.14, p = 0.0001 0.17, p = 0.0001 0.15, p = 10−5 −0.14, p = 0.001 0.15, p = 0.001 0.12, p = 0.005
sample 7: Romanian females 0.32, p = 0.08 n.a. n.a. 0.21, p = 0.0001 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
sample 8: US males—vowels 0.30, p = 0.03 0.38, p = 0.004 0.21, p = 0.13 0.18, p = 0.001 0.23, p = 0.0001 0.13, p = 0.005, 0.19, p = 0.014 0.27, p = 10−7 0.03, p = 0.54

aAlso controls for subject age in samples 2 and 3 in which age varied substantially.