Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 23;277(1700):3617–3622. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0941

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Prevalence of punishment (measured as the proportion of jolting clients that chased the cheating cleanerfish) by (a) all cheated clients combined (b) cheated clients with access to a single cleanerfish (residents, filled bars) and (c) cheated clients with potential access to more than one cleanerfish (non-residents, open bars). Bar heights and errors represent back-transformed mean ± 1 s.e. n.s. = p > 0.05 from MANOVA simple-effects analyses.